How do we weigh short-term electoral wins vs. long-term power building?
The two are deeply interrelated. In many ways, this question presents a false choice.
Short-term electoral wins are integral to long-term power building and transformational policy change. In fact, without short-term wins, we risk long-term power loss via gerrymandering, control of courts, and other right-wing structural interventions.
Bottom line: Ain’t no long term without the short term!
At the same time, if all we do is focus on short-term wins, we will never make the forward-looking investments necessary to expand the electoral map, expand progressive governance and end regressive governance at the state level, and build the holistic, bottom-up, multi-generational movement our country needs — not just for the years to come, but for the decades to come.
Sadly, too many Democratic players are not pairing their electoral work with a long-term vision or power-building strategy. The beauty of MVP is that we seek to do both wherever possible.
Other 2025 Strategy
- How do we win back the voters we lost? And the potential Dem voters who stayed home?
- Will there even be elections now that Trump is in power?
- What do we do about the media, disinformation, etc?
- What is MVP doing about the Democratic Party?
- How stable is MVP organizationally going into this time ahead?
- How will MVP’s core strategy change vs. stay the same?
- Is America just a lost cause? (Should I move to Canada?)
- What can MVP donors do now besides donating?